hmmm, maybe my hd 4770 (a low cost ATI card) is not as "efficient" as your low cost Nvidia card, .

@servocrow:

Screenshots for the 3% CPU usage, please, .

Personally, I find the quality of CyberLink and especially Corel products much better than Splash Pro. I don't even mind the higher price. However, they don't support motion interpolation on HD video, so, unfortunately, they are of no use to me (unlike Splash Pro). Yup, that is one drawback about C...

How about adding support for FLV? the VP* codecs (vp6, vp7, etc...).

i hope in the near future...especially anaglyph related technology.

Come on, seriously, you're not thinking of playing HD videos on a netbook (sans the ion chipset). It just doesn't make any sense.

my system has some nuts so very little CPU is utilized, UNLIKE say VLC which almsot always was way over the top playing any type of file, i abandoned VLC for Splash LITE, then went on to PURCHASE Splash Pro. my cpu idles around 3% MAX while playing a 1080 mkv. usually less depending on what else im...

I've been using Splash Pro for quite a while now. Recently, I downloaded a trial copy of CyberLink PowerDVD 10. I observed the following differences between Motion2 and TrueTheater Motion: 1. Motion2 at its full setting introduces artifacts and judder to videos with embedded texts (e.g., copyright n...